AI Visibility
measured36/100
Emerging · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 184 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 184 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories LiveFlow is visible in
1Executive summary
LiveFlow is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (332 reviews, 4.9★) and first-party comparison content like “LiveFlow vs. Datarails.” The single highest-ROI fix is to make pricing and structured evaluation content more AI-citable: the current pricing page is “tailored” and appears to avoid public tiered pricing, which weakens citation for “How much does LiveFlow cost?” and conversion-stage answers.
Based on audit of liveflow.com · Oct 9, 2026