[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/LiveChat
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

12

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

21

across 607 prompts

AI Share of Voice

21%

across 607 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Live Chat · of 120

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

1/74

Not Visible · Customer Support Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
391 category
Cited23%88/391
Share of voice19%avg
Engine consensus54%of engines
Competitors11.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories LiveChat is visible in

2
  • Live Chat4 of 120→
  • Customer Service & Support55 of 280→

Your visibility gap

LiveChat surfaces in 1/74 Customer Support discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 73 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim LiveChat →

Executive summary

LiveChat is already well-positioned for AI citation in mid-funnel evaluation queries (it has strong G2 review volume and a crawlable, tiered pricing page). The biggest remaining risk for the highest-value discovery gaps (e.g., “top customer support tools for enterprise companies” and “customer support software for non-profit organizations”) is that the site’s category/use-case pages are not structured as self-contained, enterprise/non-profit/e-commerce answer blocks that AI engines can reliably extract.

Based on audit of livechat.com · May 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy