AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Risk, Compliance & GRC
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals60/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
14
across 102 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 102 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Risk, Compliance & GRC
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
KYRO AI is already strongly positioned for evaluation-stage AI citations via its first-party comparison hub and published pricing ($500/month per module) that AI can read. The biggest risk for conversion-stage and “best alternatives” shortlists is missing/unclear structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) and likely thin secondary review/analyst coverage beyond G2 (e.g., TrustRadius exists, but no Gartner Peer Insights/Magic Quadrant evidence found).
Based on audit of kyro.ai · Sep 2, 2026