AI Visibility
measured52/100
Frequently Cited · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals12/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
44
across 518 prompts
AI Share of Voice
44%
across 518 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Kissflow is visible in
2Executive summary
Kissflow is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2: 591 reviews, 4.3/5) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., Kissflow vs PowerApps). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve conversion-stage pricing extractability: the main pricing page does not clearly expose tiered prices in crawlable text (pricing appears to be “contact sales” style), which reduces AI’s ability to answer “how much does Kissflow cost?” with first-party citations.
Based on audit of kissflow.com · Sep 1, 2026