[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/TuxCare
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 310 prompts

AI Share of Voice

4%

across 310 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
184 brand-level
Cited0%0/184
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories TuxCare is visible in

2
  • Endpoint Protectionnot yet measured→
  • Vulnerability Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

TuxCare is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage “best live patching / vulnerability management” queries because it has 21 G2 reviews (4.6★) and a clear enterprise Linux live-patching value proposition. The single highest-ROI fix is to add first-party, brand-led comparison and evaluation pages that directly answer “How does TuxCare compare to NinjaOne?” and “How does TuxCare compare to Acronis Cyber Protect?” while also making pricing machine-readable (public tiers, not quote-only).

Based on audit of tuxcare.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy