AI Visibility
measured9/100
Invisible · in Secrets Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals71/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 116 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 100 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Secrets Management
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories KeeperPAM is visible in
1Executive summary
Keeper is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party B2B review authority (e.g., G2 seller page shows 1,189 reviews for Keeper Password Manager) and it publishes first-party comparison content (e.g., /vs/ and “Keeper vs …” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data/AI-crawl readiness for evaluation pages (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregate rating) and ensure pricing + key pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can quote specifics reliably.
Based on audit of keepersecurity.com · May 7, 2026