AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals40/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Kannu is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries via third-party review sources (G2 and Capterra), but it is weak for conversion-stage and first-party evaluation queries because its own pricing page is “Get a Quote”/contact-gated and there are no clearly indexable first-party comparison pages found for “How does Kannu compare to Canvas LMS?” and “How does Kannu compare to Moodle?”. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, tiered pricing (not contact-only) and add first-party “[Kannu] vs Canvas LMS” / “[Kannu] vs Moodle” pages that lead with Kannu as the recommended solution.
Based on audit of kannu.com · Oct 2, 2026