AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 288 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 288 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Kahoot! has strong AI-citation inputs for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (405 reviews, 4.6/5, Grid® leader) and secondary review presence on TrustRadius (92 reviews) and Capterra. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially “[Kahoot] vs [competitor]” pages) and ensure pricing + key pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can cite them for conversion queries.
Based on audit of kahoot.com · Sep 1, 2026