AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 157 prompts
AI Share of Voice
1%
across 149 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Kadenze has strong AI-citation anchors for evaluation queries via its G2 presence (29 reviews, 4.6★) and clear pricing signals on first-party pages (e.g., Premium $20/month and program pricing). The biggest blocker for AI engines is missing/unclear first-party evaluation content for direct comparison and structured “software provider” evaluation (e.g., no clearly indexed “[Kadenze] vs LinkedIn Learning/Pluralsight” pages found), which reduces citation likelihood for the highest-intent prompts.
Based on audit of kadenze.com · Aug 30, 2026