AI Visibility
measured44/100
Frequently Cited · in Team Messaging
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 166 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 166 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Team Messaging
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Jump is visible in
1Executive summary
jumpapp.com (redirecting to Jump’s current site) is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because Jump has strong G2 presence (134 total reviews shown on G2 category pages) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page with explicit per-advisor/month prices. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing/plan” and evaluation “SoftwareApplication/FAQ schema” visibility—your site has pricing and comparison content, but schema signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) were not discoverable via search, which can reduce rich AI citation reliability.
Based on audit of jumpapp.com · Oct 2, 2026