[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Jobscan
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 163 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 163 prompts

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
93 category
Cited2%2/93
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Jobscan is visible in

1
  • Applicant Trackingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Jobscan.co is likely to be cited for job-seeker/ATS resume optimization queries, and it has meaningful third-party review signals (e.g., Trustpilot 323 reviews and G2 presence). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “best/alternatives” queries where AI prefers crawlable, structured first-party comparison/pricing content; jobscan.co has first-party comparison blog posts, but pricing/structured-data crawlability and SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style markup could not be verified from live search results.

Based on audit of jobscan.co · Jun 3, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy