[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Jobber
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

49

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

78

across 386 prompts

AI Share of Voice

78%

across 386 prompts

Category Visibility

#3

in Field Service & Workforce · of 70

Critical Issues

7

critical + high

Shortlist Position

39/80

Challenger · Field Service Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
273 category
Cited95%258/273
Share of voice87%avg
Engine consensus65%of engines
Competitors8.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Jobber is visible in

1
  • Field Service & Workforce3 of 70→

Your visibility gap

Jobber surfaces in 39/80 Field Service discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 41 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Jobber →

Executive summary

Jobber is already well-positioned for AI citation in field service discovery/evaluation queries (e.g., cited for mobile access, digital checklists, and real-time tracking), supported by strong G2 presence (480 reviews, 4.6/5, Grid leader). The biggest citation risk is missing/weak coverage for high-intent evaluation gaps like time tracking, customer feedback collection, service contracts/SLAs, safety compliance, and workforce scheduling/planning—so AI has fewer first-party pages to cite for those specific feature-fit questions.

Based on audit of getjobber.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy