AI Visibility
measured64/100
Frequently Cited · in Field Service & Workforce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals49/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
78
across 386 prompts
AI Share of Voice
78%
across 386 prompts
Critical Issues
7
critical + high
Shortlist Position
39/80
Challenger · Field Service Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Field Service & Workforce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Jobber is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Jobber surfaces in 39/80 Field Service discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 41 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Jobber is already well-positioned for AI citation in field service discovery/evaluation queries (e.g., cited for mobile access, digital checklists, and real-time tracking), supported by strong G2 presence (480 reviews, 4.6/5, Grid leader). The biggest citation risk is missing/weak coverage for high-intent evaluation gaps like time tracking, customer feedback collection, service contracts/SLAs, safety compliance, and workforce scheduling/planning—so AI has fewer first-party pages to cite for those specific feature-fit questions.
Based on audit of getjobber.com · May 7, 2026