AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Audit & SOX
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 141 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 141 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Audit & SOX
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Isolocity is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation and conversion prompts because it has a high-rated G2 presence (4.8★) and publicly readable first-party pricing. The biggest risk for AI engines is missing/unclear first-party structured comparison and evaluation schema (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage), which reduces eligibility for queries like "How does Isolocity compare to MasterControl Quality Management System?" and "What is the best quality management (QMS) software for regulated manufacturing?" The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/SSR-index first-party comparison pages that explicitly lead with Isolocity vs MasterControl Quality Management System, Arena PLM & QMS, and Qualio, and back them with FAQPage + SoftwareApplication schema.
Based on audit of isolocity.com · Oct 5, 2026