[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/IQVIA
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

12

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

31

across 191 prompts

AI Share of Voice

31%

across 191 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
121 category
Cited39%47/121
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories IQVIA is visible in

1
  • Healthcare ITnot yet measured→

Executive summary

IQVIA is likely to be cited by AI engines for brand-aware, trust-stage queries (e.g., “IQVIA reviews” and “is IQVIA reliable”) because it has a strong LinkedIn presence and appears in Gartner Peer Insights for at least one product/market. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison and pricing queries (e.g., “IQVIA vs competitor” and “IQVIA pricing”) because the site does not surface crawlable, tiered pricing and there were no first-party “IQVIA vs …” comparison pages found in live search.

Based on audit of iqvia.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy