AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Project Management Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
53
across 600 prompts
AI Share of Voice
53%
across 600 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Project Management Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Intervals is visible in
2Executive summary
Intervals is a B2B time tracking + project management SaaS with strong primary-market visibility via G2 (136 reviews, 3.9★) and meaningful first-party evaluation content (e.g., “Intervals compared to other web-based project management services” and multiple “alternative” pages). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage crawlability: pricing and structured evaluation signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLM-friendly files) are not clearly discoverable from search, which limits direct-answer eligibility for “How much does Intervals cost?” and “best time tracking software for client invoicing and billing?”. Highest-ROI fix: ensure pricing is fully crawlable/SSR and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema for the exact evaluation queries you want to win.
Based on audit of myintervals.com · Sep 29, 2026