[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Innago
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

13

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

19

across 149 prompts

AI Share of Voice

19%

across 149 prompts

Category Visibility

#28

in Real Estate & Property Management · of 174

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
73 brand-level
Cited11%8/73
Share of voice4%avg
Engine consensus38%of engines
Competitors23.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Innago is visible in

1
  • Real Estate & Property Management28 of 174→

Executive summary

Innago is a B2B property management SaaS with strong third-party credibility (e.g., 577 G2 reviews at 4.9★ per your pre-verified context) and a crawlable, public pricing page that states “No monthly fee” and “No contract.” The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: while Innago hosts first-party comparison content (e.g., “Innago Vs Buildium”), there is no evidence (from live checks) of crawlable structured evaluation markup (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) or robust schema that AI engines can reliably extract for “How does Innago compare to Buildium/AppFolio/DoorLoop?” and “How much does Innago cost?” queries.

Based on audit of innago.com · Jun 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy