AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Legal Tech
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals55/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 233 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 233 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Legal Tech
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Ontra is visible in
2Executive summary
Ontra is already likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 presence (10 reviews, 4.6/5) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page with a visible $2,000 monthly minimum for at least one edition. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison queries ("Ontra vs X" / "alternatives to Ontra") because there is no evidence of first-party, brand-led comparison pages on ontra.ai; the highest-ROI fix is to publish indexed, brand-led comparison pages and FAQ-style evaluation content that AI engines can quote.
Based on audit of ontra.ai · Oct 9, 2026