AI Visibility
measured63/100
Frequently Cited · in Field Service & Workforce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals53/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
98
across 309 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 293 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Field Service & Workforce
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
IFS is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (multiple IFS products) and visible Gartner Peer Insights pages for IFS products. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially crawlable “[IFS product] vs [competitor]” pages and a publicly readable pricing page) so AI engines can cite IFS directly for comparison and cost queries rather than relying on third parties.
Based on audit of ifs.com · May 6, 2026