AI Visibility
measured59/100
Frequently Cited · in Field Service & Workforce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
98
across 309 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 293 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Field Service & Workforce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
IFS is a strong B2B citation candidate for evaluation-stage queries because it has active Gartner Peer Insights pages and a G2 seller profile. The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing + comparison” queries: IFS pricing appears to require contact/estimation rather than public tiered pricing, and first-party “[IFS] vs [Competitor]” surfaces are not clearly evidenced as crawlable, self-contained evaluation pages.
Based on audit of ifs.com · Aug 29, 2026