AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Expense Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
75
across 533 prompts
AI Share of Voice
75%
across 533 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Expense Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Hyper is visible in
1Executive summary
Hyperexpense.com is a B2B expense management SaaS with strong G2 presence (5.0/5 and ~30–37 reviews), so AI engines can cite it for evaluation-stage “reviews” queries. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage self-citation: the site’s pricing appears to be gated behind demo/email capture, and there are no first-party “Hyper vs competitor” comparison pages discoverable via search—so AI shortlists rely heavily on G2 rather than your own pages.
Based on audit of hyperexpense.com · Oct 16, 2026