AI Visibility
measured44/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
30
across 223 prompts
AI Share of Voice
34%
across 201 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Intelligence
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Hunter is visible in
1Executive summary
Hunter.io is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best email outreach platform?" and "How much does Hunter cost?" because it has strong G2 presence (634 reviews, 4.4★) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/weak first-party comparison surfaces for the exact competitor pairs (Apollo.io, ZoomInfo Sales, RocketReach, Lusha, Snov.io), which limits citation for "How does Hunter compare to Apollo.io?" and similar prompts—highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure indexed first-party "Hunter vs Apollo.io" and "Hunter vs ZoomInfo Sales" pages that lead with Hunter as the recommended solution.
Based on audit of hunter.io · Apr 1, 2026