[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Hirevue
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

21

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

29

across 264 prompts

AI Share of Voice

29%

across 264 prompts

Category Visibility

#35

in Applicant Tracking · of 93

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
139 category
Cited38%53/139
Share of voice28%avg
Engine consensus51%of engines
Competitors20.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Hirevue is visible in

2
  • AI Recruiting7 of 78→
  • Applicant Tracking34 of 93→

Executive summary

Hirevue is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage “best video interviewing software” style prompts because it has 255 G2 reviews at 4.1★ and a robust first-party pricing page. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party comparison and evaluation pages that explicitly answer the competitor-specific queries (e.g., “How does Hirevue compare to VidCruiter?”) so AI engines can cite Hirevue directly instead of relying on third-party review sites.

Based on audit of hirevue.com · May 20, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy