AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals8/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
14
across 248 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 248 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Harver is visible in
2Executive summary
Harver is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 171 reviews with a 4.6/5 rating). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage queries like “Harver pricing” because Harver appears to be quote/demo-only with no publicly crawlable pricing tiers on its own site.
Based on audit of harver.com · Sep 2, 2026