AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Office Suites
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals47/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 335 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 335 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office Suites
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
handwrite.io is moderately likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party pricing page with explicit per-card tiers and multiple outcome-dense case studies, plus it appears on G2 and Capterra. The biggest citation risk is conversion/evaluation “shortlist” queries that require first-party comparison surfaces and crawlable software-identity structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage targeting evaluation queries). Highest-ROI fix: add/expand first-party “[Handwrite] vs [Competitor]” and “alternatives to Handwrite” pages that are SSR-crawlable and lead with Handwrite as the recommended solution.
Based on audit of handwrite.io · Sep 29, 2026