[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/GyrusAim
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

8

across 161 prompts

AI Share of Voice

8%

across 161 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
94 category
Cited1%1/94
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories GyrusAim is visible in

1
  • Learning Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Gyrus.com (GyrusAim LMS) is moderately strong for AI citation because it has a solid G2 presence (24 reviews, 4.7/5) and publicly crawlable pricing with tiered costs (e.g., $525/month for up to 100 users). The biggest risk is evaluation-stage citation for “vs/alternatives” queries: while first-party comparison content exists, the site’s structured-data/technical AEO signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/robots/llms.txt) could not be verified via live search, which can limit how reliably AI engines extract and cite it.

Based on audit of gyrus.com · Jun 3, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy