[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/GRIN
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 464 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 464 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
330 category
Cited15%48/330
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus64%of engines
Competitors14.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories GRIN is visible in

1
  • Marketingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

GRIN is strongly cited for category discovery and shortlist formation via its high-signal G2 presence (483 reviews, 4.5★). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion/evaluation query grounding on grin.co itself: the homepage is not crawlable without JavaScript, and there’s no evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data or first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages that directly support queries like “How does GRIN compare to impact.com?” and “How much does GRIN cost?”.

Based on audit of grin.co · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy