AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 439 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 439 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Greetly is a B2B visitor management SaaS with strong third-party review visibility (G2 shows 21 reviews with a 4.8/5 average) and publicly crawlable pricing ($99/mo Essential, $159/mo Pro billed yearly). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: while first-party comparison pages exist (e.g., Greetly vs Envoy / vs Eptura / vs Sign In App), there’s no clear evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data or crawl-direct “AI-ready” schema on key pages, which limits how reliably AI engines can extract product attributes for “best/alternatives/pricing” queries.
Based on audit of greetly.com · Sep 30, 2026