AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in AI Applications
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
74
across 28 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 12 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Applications
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Gravyty is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (103 reviews, 4.4/5) and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., “Advance vs. GiveCampus”, “Raise vs. Momentum”). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen crawlable, structured evaluation assets on gravyty.com itself—especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and a publicly crawlable pricing surface—so AI can cite Gravyty directly for “pricing” and “vs/alternatives” prompts without relying on third parties.
Based on audit of gravyty.com · Sep 1, 2026