AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Sales Engagement
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 308 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 308 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Engagement
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories GMass is visible in
2Executive summary
gmass.co is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,331+ reviews, ~4.7/5) and a fully public, detailed pricing page with tiered prices. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting evaluation queries and brand-led comparison pages) so AI can cite gmass.co directly for “alternatives” and “vs” prompts rather than relying on third-party review sites.
Based on audit of gmass.co · Aug 31, 2026