AI Visibility
measured71/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Search
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
93
across 601 prompts
AI Share of Voice
94%
across 579 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Search
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Glean is highly likely to be cited for category shortlists because it has strong G2 presence (143 reviews, 4.7★) and active enterprise customer-story pages with measurable outcomes. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison and pricing: first-party “[Glean] vs Guru/Notion/Coveo/Kore.AI” pages and crawlable tiered pricing appear missing or not discoverable, which blocks direct-answer eligibility for prompts like “How does Glean compare to Guru?” and “How much does Glean cost?”. Highest-ROI fix: publish/ensure indexable first-party comparison pages for each competitor and a publicly crawlable pricing page (tiers/prices) so AI engines can cite Glean directly for evaluation queries.
Based on audit of glean.com · Apr 2, 2026