AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 662 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 662 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Collaboration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Giftogram is visible in
3Executive summary
Giftogram is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,896 reviews, 4.8/5) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit fee/volume details. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing/plan” and evaluation-stage “SoftwareApplication/FAQ” structured extraction: the site’s pricing is accessible, but there’s no evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema or crawlable first-party comparison pages that AI can reliably cite.
Based on audit of giftogram.com · Aug 31, 2026