[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/GetApp
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 417 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 399 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
311 category
Cited26%82/311
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus43%of engines
Competitors32.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited29%4/14
Share of voice29%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited33%2/6
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories GetApp is visible in

1
  • Software Marketplace3 of 26→

Citation source profile

Review aggregator — scored as citation source, not software buyer

GetApp is highly likely to be cited for evaluation and alternatives queries because it is a major software review aggregator with an active G2 presence (16 reviews, 4★ per your pre-verified context) and first-party comparison surfaces for software-vs-software evaluation (e.g., “X vs Y Comparison (2026)” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party, brand-led comparison coverage specifically for the evaluation prompts “How does GetApp compare to G2?” / “...to Capterra?” / “...to TrustRadius?” / “...to Software Advice?” so AI engines can cite GetApp for those brand-vs-brand questions rather than relying on third-party comparison pages.

Based on audit of getapp.com · Apr 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy