AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals44/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 587 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 587 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Galaxy is visible in
2Executive summary
Galaxy has strong baseline AI citation signals for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (22 reviews, 5★) and active first-party documentation content, but it is unlikely to be cited for SQL IDE-specific prompts because the site positions Galaxy as enterprise context management rather than an SQL Integrated Development Environments (IDE). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation pages that directly answer the exact prompts (especially the “Galaxy vs DbVisualizer” and “Galaxy vs DBeaver” comparison intent) and align the on-page category framing to “SQL Integrated Development Environments (IDE)”.
Based on audit of getgalaxy.io · Aug 31, 2026