[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Freshteam
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

37

across 469 prompts

AI Share of Voice

36%

across 445 prompts

Category Visibility

#30

in Applicant Tracking · of 53

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
331 category
Cited49%162/331
Share of voice47%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors0.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited58%7/12
Share of voice58%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited67%4/6
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Freshteam is visible in

2
  • Applicant Tracking30 of 53→
  • HRISnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Freshworks is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (Freshworks products show thousands of G2 reviews) and it publishes first-party comparison content like “Freshdesk vs Zendesk” and “Freshdesk vs Intercom.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable, schema-backed evaluation surfaces for pricing and “Freshworks vs Zendesk/Intercom” style prompts (including SoftwareApplication/FAQPage), so AI engines can answer “How much does Freshworks cost?” and comparison questions directly from freshworks.com rather than relying on third parties.

Based on audit of freshworks.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy