[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Forma
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

15

across 338 prompts

AI Share of Voice

15%

across 338 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
205 category
Cited15%30/205
Share of voice15%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Forma is visible in

2
  • Expense Managementnot yet measured→
  • Spend Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

joinforma.com (Forma) is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 presence (785 reviews, 4.8/5, Grid® leader) and detailed, ROI-dense first-party content. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries that require crawlable, structured pricing and comparison surfaces (no clear first-party “Forma vs competitor” pages found in live search; pricing appears to be quote-based rather than tiered list pricing). Highest-ROI fix: add/ensure crawlable pricing structure (tiers/PEPM ranges) and implement SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema on product/pricing pages so AI engines can confidently answer “Forma pricing” and “Forma vs X” queries from first-party sources.

Based on audit of joinforma.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy