AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in Resource Planning
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
27
across 203 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 187 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Resource Planning
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Harvest (getharvest.com) is a B2B time tracking + invoicing SaaS with strong AI citation signals from G2 and Capterra, plus publicly crawlable pricing tiers. The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” coverage: while Harvest has first-party comparison content (e.g., Harvest vs Toggl), there’s no clear evidence of a comprehensive, indexed first-party comparison matrix for the full shortlist queries AI engines use.
Based on audit of getharvest.com · Jun 5, 2026