[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/FoodDocs
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

3

across 1090 prompts

AI Share of Voice

3%

across 1090 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
741 category
Cited1%9/741
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors3.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories FoodDocs is visible in

3
  • Compliance Automationnot yet measured→
  • Risk, Compliance & GRCnot yet measured→
  • Vertical SaaSnot yet measured→

Executive summary

FoodDocs is a B2B food safety management SaaS with a strong G2 presence (4.9/5 from 18 reviews) and publicly crawlable pricing with per-site tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: while FoodDocs has at least one first-party comparison page (FoodDocs vs FoodReady), there is no clear evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and there are no visible TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights signals.

Based on audit of fooddocs.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy