AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals43/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 168 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 168 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories FontBase is visible in
1Executive summary
FontBase is moderately likely to be cited by AI engines for “best font manager” and “FontBase vs [competitor]” style queries because it has a first-party comparison page (FontBase vs Monotype Connect) and appears on G2 with 49 reviews (4.3/5). The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage “pricing” and “how it works” queries: pricing is present but there’s no evidence (from live checks) of crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) or robust AI-crawl controls (robots.txt/llms.txt/sitemap access).
Based on audit of fontba.se · Oct 9, 2026