AI Visibility
measured44/100
Frequently Cited · in Team Messaging
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals8/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
24
across 188 prompts
AI Share of Voice
24%
across 188 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Team Messaging
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Flock is visible in
1Executive summary
flock.com is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (G2 shows 301 reviews) and first-party evaluation content like a dedicated “Flock vs Slack” comparison page plus a publicly accessible pricing page with tier details. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting pricing/integrations/comparison queries) so AI engines can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing / integrations” from first-party pages.
Based on audit of flock.com · Sep 1, 2026