AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals24/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
70
across 632 prompts
AI Share of Voice
70%
across 632 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Fireflies.ai is visible in
3Executive summary
Fireflies.ai is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 presence (746 reviews) and clear, public per-seat pricing pages (e.g., Pro $10/user/mo billed annually; Business $19/mo/user billed annually; Enterprise $39/mo/user billed annually). The highest-risk query pattern is conversion-stage “Fireflies pricing”/“Fireflies cost” where AI engines can only cite what they can reliably crawl and parse—so the single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing is consistently crawlable/SSR across the main pricing entrypoints and is backed by machine-readable structured data.
Based on audit of fireflies.ai · Jun 7, 2026