AI Visibility
measured32/100
Emerging · in Digital Asset Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals6/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
37
across 559 prompts
AI Share of Voice
37%
across 559 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Asset Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Filestage is visible in
3Executive summary
Filestage is a B2B online proofing/review & approval SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (242 reviews) plus multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Filestage vs Frame.io, Filestage vs Ziflow). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data + crawlability for evaluation pages (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Product+Offer) and ensure pricing is fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can cite pricing and “vs” evaluation answers reliably.
Based on audit of filestage.io · May 7, 2026