AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Field Service & Workforce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals16/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
18
across 162 prompts
AI Share of Voice
18%
across 162 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Field Service & Workforce
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories FieldPulse is visible in
1Executive summary
FieldPulse is likely to be cited by AI engines for field service management evaluation queries because it has a substantial G2 review footprint (349 reviews on G2) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan, FieldPulse vs FieldEdge). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve Technical AEO/Structured Data for evaluation queries: add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema and ensure AI-crawlable pricing content (current pricing is quote-gated via “Get a Custom Quote”).
Based on audit of fieldpulse.com · May 6, 2026