[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Field Materials
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

4

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

3

across 394 prompts

AI Share of Voice

3%

across 394 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
205 category
Cited1%2/205
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors24.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Field Materials is visible in

3
  • Construction Softwarenot yet measured→
  • Field Service & Workforcenot yet measured→
  • Inventory Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Field Materials is a B2B construction procurement SaaS with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (22 reviews, 4.8/5) and substantial first-party case studies and integration pages. The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage queries that require crawlable pricing and first-party comparison pages; the site appears to route pricing to “schedule a demo/personalized quote” rather than public tiered pricing, and no first-party “Field Materials vs …” pages were found in live search.

Based on audit of fieldmaterials.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy