AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals21/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
57
across 290 prompts
AI Share of Voice
57%
across 290 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Fellow.app (now serving content on fellow.ai) is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and shortlist queries because it has strong G2 presence (2,436 reviews on G2) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit per-user tiers. The biggest risk for AI citation is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “self-serve” extraction: ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Product+Offer) and first-party comparison pages are fully crawlable and indexed on the fellow.app domain.
Based on audit of fellow.app · Sep 1, 2026