AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Commerce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 320 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 320 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Commerce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Feedvisor is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries because it has 35 G2 reviews at 4.5★ and first-party competitor comparison pages (e.g., Agentis by Feedvisor vs. Teikametrics). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve conversion-stage crawlability for pricing: the site appears to use demo-gated CTAs and does not clearly expose tiered product pricing on a dedicated, crawlable pricing page for AI to cite.
Based on audit of feedvisor.com · Oct 3, 2026