AI Visibility
measured8/100
Invisible · in HRIS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 537 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 537 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
3/74
Not Visible · Hr Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in HRIS
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Factorial is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Factorial surfaces in 3/74 Hr discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 71 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Factorial is already strong for AI citation in brand-aware evaluation prompts because it has a high-signal G2 presence (104 reviews, 4.4★) and publicly accessible pricing starting at $8 PEPM. The biggest AI visibility risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Factorial has at least one first-party competitor comparison page (e.g., Factorial vs BambooHR), there’s no clear evidence of first-party pages for the highest-intent competitor set (Rippling, Gusto, Personio, Workday) and no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data—so queries like “How does Factorial compare to Rippling?” and “How much does Factorial cost?” may be answered inconsistently.
Based on audit of factorialhr.com · May 7, 2026