AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in Note-Taking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals64/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
97
across 194 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 178 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Note-Taking
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Evernote is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review volume on G2 (2,028 reviews) and secondary corroboration on TrustRadius (1,686 reviews), plus publicly accessible plan/pricing pages (including enterprise seat pricing). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for comparison-style queries (e.g., ensure indexed, brand-led “[Evernote] vs [Competitor]” pages and add evaluation FAQ schema), because the current “vs” surface appears to be competitor-focused rather than clearly brand-led.
Based on audit of evernote.com · May 7, 2026