AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Performance Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 157 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 157 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Performance Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories EvalFlow is visible in
2Executive summary
EvalFlow is already highly citable for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (4.8★) and publicly crawlable pricing ($6/user/month). The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “comparison” coverage: ensure first-party pages exist and are indexable for each competitor comparison prompt (especially Lattice and Culture Amp/Rippling/ADP Workforce Now), because AI engines heavily prefer brand-led “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” sources.
Based on audit of evalflow.com · Oct 6, 2026