[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Epic Systems
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

56

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

41

across 136 prompts

AI Share of Voice

39%

across 120 prompts

Category Visibility

#36

in Healthcare IT · of 116

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
118 category
Cited43%51/118
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Epic Systems is visible in

1
  • Healthcare IT35 of 116→

Executive summary

Epic is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has very strong third-party review authority (e.g., 936 G2 reviews with a 4.2/5 rating) and active B2B ecosystem surfaces (Epic on FHIR, Vendor Services, Showroom/Connection Hub). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation/citation surfaces for “Epic vs [competitor]” and “Epic pricing” by ensuring crawlable, SSR-first comparison and pricing content (tiered, machine-readable where possible), since pricing appears sales-led and first-party vs pages were not found in live search.

Based on audit of epic.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy