AI Visibility
measured75/100
Frequently Cited · in Healthcare IT
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
99
across 516 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 500 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Healthcare IT
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Epic is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has very strong third-party review authority (e.g., 936 G2 reviews with a 4.2/5 rating) and active B2B ecosystem surfaces (Epic on FHIR, Vendor Services, Showroom/Connection Hub). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation/citation surfaces for “Epic vs [competitor]” and “Epic pricing” by ensuring crawlable, SSR-first comparison and pricing content (tiered, machine-readable where possible), since pricing appears sales-led and first-party vs pages were not found in live search.
Based on audit of epic.com · Jun 4, 2026