[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Emburse Tallie
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

18

across 99 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 83 prompts

Category Visibility

#61

in Expense Management · of 108

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
79 brand-level
Cited8%6/79
Share of voice3%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors8.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Emburse Tallie is visible in

1
  • Expense Management60 of 108→

Executive summary

Emburse is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 review volume (e.g., 2,018 reviews for Emburse Expense Enterprise) and first-party evaluation content like “Emburse vs. Concur.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Organization sameAs) and ensure it’s consistently present across product and pricing pages so AI Overviews can reliably extract “what it is / pricing / integrations” in one pass.

Based on audit of emburse.com · May 19, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy